VOICES FROM THE COMMUNITY:

The visionPDX Input Report

EDUCATION:
Funding

 


back  |  next

     

Portlanders demand stable, reliable funding for the city’s public schools and a responsive and accountable school administration.

Section Summary

Portlanders identify school funding as urgent, and wonder why financial support for public education continues to be unstable when the problem is well known by politicians, local and state government, school districts and community members alike. They believe that Portland is losing its cherished family-friendly environment due, in part, to the school funding crisis and failing schools. Many respondents demand a solution to this problem, even if it means tax increases.

Others suspect that school officials are squandering money rather than seeking and implementing solutions to the problem. These Portlanders believe that internal reform of school administration is needed, advocating for this approach over an increase in funding for public education.

Many respondents are concerned that low-income families and children/youth of color bear a disproportionate burden of the school funding crisis. They assert unequal distribution of resources leads to failing schools and higher drop-out rates, and that this inequity needs to be addressed for all students to have an opportunity to succeed.

Note: More information on this subject can be found in Education: Pre-K-12 Schools, Government: Spending and Government: State and Local Taxes.

Summary of Main Ideas

  1. Public schools deserve a stable and reliable source of funding.
  2. An increase in school funding is needed to improve the quality of public education.
  3. Portland’s schools could be improved by focusing on internal reform.
  4. School administration must be responsive and accountable to the community.
  5. Financial resources should be distributed equitably among the city’s schools.

Summary of Tensions and Disagreements

  1. Do our public schools need more money or do they need to use presently budgeted funds more effectively?

MAIN IDEAS

  1. Public schools deserve a stable and reliable source of funding.
  • Portlanders are in agreement over the need to provide reliable and stable funding to the city’s public schools.
  • A large number of Portlanders are frustrated and wary of “quick-fix” solutions and want a permanent, sustainable, long-term solution put in place to provide stability to our public schools.
  • Many people are concerned with how the perception of an unstable school system dissuades parents from enrolling their children in public schools and the ripple effect that has on the stability of the larger education system.
  • Many people understand that school funding is a statewide issue, but call on Portland to find a solution that works for our city as well as the rest of the state.
  • A small number of people argued that Portlanders without children should not have to pay for public schools.
“The funding for our schools is a disgrace and very short-sighted.”

“I’m concerned about the lack of resources devoted to our public schools. While I realize this is primarily an issue of our state-funding mechanism, the instability or perceived instability of our school system is a major concern.”

“Better funding of public education. I realize this is a statewide issue, but maybe Portland can lead the way in lobbying those elected officials in Salem in understanding that to keep Oregon, Portland, beautiful, livable and desirable we need to provide education to our children, not just prisons for our criminals.”

Sample Strategies:

  1. Institute a sales tax to fund high quality public education.
  2. “Stop bussing – it would save money.”
  3. “I would like to see someone take a look at Portland’s schools and the budget for the schools and complete a search nationwide to find successful schools with similar financial footprints – and adopt their successful practices.”
  4. “Sit down with state leaders, local political leaders, major funders, the Portland Schools Foundation and figure out what PPS needs to be more creative, effective and responsive—to move from a vision of scarcity to one of opportunities.”
  5. Repeal Measure 50.
  6. Keep the “kicker” money and put it to use supporting schools.
  7. “We will have a baseball stadium. The rich will pay for the tickets and the baseball team will help pay for the education of the kids.”
  8. Tax SUVs and high fructose corn syrup.
  9. Run a series of events—such as City-sponsored televised fundraisers or student-led projects—to raise money from the community.
  10. Tax big businesses to fund social and education services.

  1. An increase in school funding is needed to ensure educational quality.
  • A majority of respondents support an increase in educational funding as a means to creating better quality schools.
  • People are upset over the general state of Portland’s public schools, and they identify the following as specific contributors to poor school quality and student learning:
    • Deteriorated school facilities;
    • Large class sizes;
    • Inadequate technology;
    • Limited resources for students with disabilities;
    • Underpaid teachers;
    • Unqualified teachers; and
    • Poor library resources.
  • If additional funding is allocated to schools, the administrators must be held accountable to ensure that these additional funds are spent in ways that improve student learning.
  • Many Portlanders want to identify measurements to determine the effectiveness of any additional funding.
“Without increased funding not only are the students deprived of the education they deserve, but the grounds and buildings do not provide them with an environment that will make them feel proud and provide them with a sense of worth.”

“It is sad that our schools are not funded properly. I hate reading when schools have to cut art programs, teaching jobs, and close schools. There needs to be more money sent into our schools.”

Sample Strategies:

  1. “Educational funding should be a top priority, and we could demonstrate this by raising taxes and paying teachers high salaries as an incentive.”

  1. Portland’s schools could be improved by focusing on internal reform.
  • Some people believe that schools could operate effectively with existing funds if not for ineffective administrators, massive organizational inefficiencies, bureaucratic waste and poor decision-making.
  • People also believe that we do not need as many administrators and that their salaries are too high.
  • Some Portlanders believe that the entire school administration should be reorganized and the staffing structure is in need of an overhaul to make better use of funding.
“Stop coming to property owners for bond issues for schools and other funding problems. I do not want to pay more when there is no discussion of waste and corruption.”

“[I want] financial accountability from the School Board and administration officers. I believe our school system is top heavy in upper administration positions.”

“I believe that funding might not need to be increased, just redistributed. Does the education board need to be making what they are when our kids aren’t getting the education they should?”

“I’m very concerned about the schools, yet believe the answer lies in changing the state laws and allocation, not in taxing Portland residents more. I’ve voted for every tax levy for schools, but no more.”

Sample Strategies:

  1. Cut administration salaries and reduce the amount of administrative jobs.
  2. Re-examine the school budget and eliminate unnecessary administrative costs so the funding benefits the students directly.

  1. School administration must be responsive and accountable to the community.
  • Respondents desire greater accountability on the part of school administrators for the financial and operational management of schools and want higher levels of efficiency and effectiveness in school administration.
  • Community members want to play a greater role in the school district’s decision-making process.
  • Portlanders insist that school administrators increase their level of responsiveness to parents and community members.
“Hold the Portland Public School District accountable for their budget … It is grossly mismanaged.”

“The district needs to listen to the community and the community needs to hold the district accountable for the state of Portland’s public education.”

“I am all in favor of the schools but think when they get money it is not spent right. I believe all public funds need to be accountable.”

Sample Strategies:

  1. “Perhaps [we need] a state-wide rather than locally governed school plan and administration.”
  2. Launch an accurate, independent, timely audit of school district expenditures.
  3. “[Hold a] public forum/lecture series on school funding and taxes.” (See Education: Community Education and Government: State and Local Taxes)

  1. Financial resources should be distributed equitably among the city’s schools.
  • Portlanders want to ensure that every student is well served by the public education system.
  • Portlanders frequently cite the significant variations in educational resources and quality among the city’s schools. (See Education: Pre-K-12 Schools and Urban Livability: Access).
  • Some believe that school choice creates segregation and damages neighborhood schools, as many parents choose to transfer their children to higher performing schools in other neighborhoods.
  • Respondents name students of color, low-income students and non-native English speakers as children and youth currently underserved by the public school system.
“I would like Portland to address the issue of fair funding for high schools. As a native Portlander I find it shameful the disparity between predominately white schools and predominately minority schools.”

“I went to a school in NW Portland for eight years and now go to Grant High School in NE. The opportunities and activities that are offered to kids living in wealthy, ‘good school’ neighborhoods are much more plentiful than the opportunities offered to kids who live more on the outskirts. It would be beneficial to Portland if there were equal opportunities for all students.”

“Poor neighborhoods have schools with less resources. The kids who need the most get the least.”

“We clearly have schools for the haves and have nots. It is not equal.”

TENSIONS AND DISAGREEMENTS

  1. Do our public schools need more money or do they need to use presently budgeted funds more effectively?

    Portlanders are generally open to being taxed for the good of the community and often mention public schools as something they would financially support. Throughout this section, respondents urge the State of Oregon—and even local municipalities—to solve the school funding crisis by ensuring adequate and stable tax revenue for education. These respondents believe that the primary solution to failing schools is a financial one.

    Others, however, are fed up with taxes and school levies that do not seem to holistically improve student learning. These Portlanders believe that schools have enough money, but that much of these funds are ill spent on bureaucracy and school administration. A tension arises in considering the call for more accountability and oversight of school administration while also reducing administrative expenses and whether it is possible to do both. A smaller number of respondents believe that financing public education should not be borne by the entire community, but only by those who have school-aged children.