Portlanders
want efficient, fast, safe, clean and
"eco-friendly" public transportation that
serves all neighborhoods equitably.
In 2030 Portlanders want efficient, fast,
safe, clean public transportation that
serves all neighborhoods equitably within
the greater metropolitan area. They imagine
a city where people can get around easily
without a car and where the majority uses
public transportation, combined with alternate
modes such as walking and bicycling. They
want to see public transportation expanded,
although there is considerable debate
about whether the city should focus on
MAX expansion or expand buses, trollies
and streetcars, which are generally perceived
as serving a greater number of people.
There is concern that Portlanders will
not abandon their cars in favor of public
transportation as long as travel times
are so much shorter in cars. There is
also concern that public transportation
is not available in all parts of the city
and that it can be unpleasant and/or unsafe
for riders. There is also a concern with
cost; most people want to see the cost
of public transit reduced.
Within this section, a smaller number
of Portlanders believe that “the car is
here to stay” and that public transportation
should not be expanded any further. These
individuals feel that spending money on
public transportation only distracts from
the larger problem of making sure Portland’s
roads and freeways are ready to handle
a growing population.
-
Many Portlanders highly value the city’s
public transportation system.
-
In the future, public transit will offer
well-integrated, comprehensive services
throughout the metro region.
- More people
will use public transit if it is faster,
safer, and more affordable.
- Public transportation
investments should serve the greatest
number of people possible.
- Public transportation
can and should be cleaner and “greener.”
- Is Portland’s
public transportation system excellent,
decent, or in need of major improvement?
- Should public
transit be expanded?
- Should more
MAX lines be created?
- Should Fareless
Square be expanded, eliminated or left
as is?
- Many
Portlanders highly value the
city’s public transportation
system.
- Many people believe that Portland
already has one of the best
public transportation systems
in the country.
- People who are not car owners
or do not want to own cars value
Portland because they feel they
can easily get around the city
on public transportation.
- Portlanders value public transportation
because it is convenient, but
also because it builds community
and protects the environment.
- Most people express strong
appreciation for Fareless Square,
although a minority vehemently
believes it encourages abuse
of the MAX by "tough" characters
who get on downtown and then
ride for free to other parts
of town.
- Portlanders who identify themselves
as disabled, elderly, homeless
or low-income tend to express
particularly strong support
for Portland’s public transportation
system.
| “I
am totally hooked on public
transportation... I am continually
impressed with how quickly
I can get somewhere using
the bus and Max, especially
during rush hour. This goes
back to people, but I am
very proud to live in a
city that has created such
an efficient and effective
public transportation system
which helps traffic and
air pollution.” |
| “I
value our commitment to
public transportation. I
value designing cities for
residents instead of automobiles.” |
- In
the future, public transit will
offer well-integrated, comprehensive
services throughout the metro
region.
| "With
light-rail and mass transit
connecting all major parts
of the city, more people
would walk, bike, or take
mass transit than drive.
Full connective bike lanes,
public spaces, and community
meeting spots would turn
Portland into the most pedestrian
and bike friendly city in
the nation.” |
| “[In
2030] public transportation
(and bike support) is good
enough that single-driver
cars are the least popular
way to get around.” |
- Charge higher fares
for late-night travel to off-set
the costs of running busses
later. Even with the higher
fares, taking the bus will be
much cheaper than taking a taxi.
- Create express train lines
from Portland to the coast and
a “ski train” up to Mt. Hood.
- Support the development of
water taxis/water ferries to
Vancouver.
Better-integrated
public transit to connect
Portland’s neighborhoods:
- In general, people question
the concept of having all transit
routed through downtown and
would prefer to see better linkages
between Portland’s neighborhood
districts.
- Specifically, people call
for improved North/South transit
on the Eastside. Many people
mentioned wanting to travel
by public transit between Northeast
and Southeast without having
to go downtown or spend so much
time on the bus.
- Many people complained of
living near MAX lines they cannot
use because there is no bus
to take them to the MAX and
no place to safely park their
car near the MAX. This is a
particular problem for the MAX
line to the airport.
| “I
would like to see a reduction
in car dependence. I currently
drive to work everyday because
public transportation is
awkward between my home
and my workplace (OHSU).” |
- Bring back the streetcar
on the Eastside, both to increase
public transit use and to better
connect underserved neighborhoods
to existing MAX and Bus lines.
- “Try some small, effective
busses on spur routes that feed
either MAX or larger bus lines.
Shuttles for areas with high
pedestrian, bus, and auto traffic,
specifically NW 23rd.”
- Smaller, more frequent busses
for non-peak hours.
- Increase the size and number
of parking lots near MAX stations,
so more people can use MAX lines
near their neighborhoods.
- More
people will use public transit
if it is faster, safer, and
more affordable.
| “Connections
don’t meet in a timely manner,
too much waiting and walking
to be effective. When one
can drive to work in ½ or
less the time it takes on
mass transit, what is the
incentive?” |
| “I
admit that Portland has
great public transit (MAX,
streetcars, Bus), but I
think it still could be
improved. For example, I
have taken transit to a
location in Beaverton and
it takes one hour by bus
and 15 minutes by car. I
think if the transit was
better and faster in the
suburbs, than more people
would want to take it.” |
- Smaller, more frequent
busses for non-peak hours to
help people get places faster.
- Split busses on major avenues
such as SE Powell or NE Killingsworth
into A and B busses and have
them stop at every other stop.
This would speed up travel times
without reducing coverage.
- Eliminate half the MAX stops
downtown.
- Create express MAX lines and/or
bus lines for long commutes,
such as between Northeast and
Southeast Portland or East Portland
and the West Suburbs.
Safer,
more pleasant public transportation:
- Many people mention the unpleasantness
of riding on the MAX because
of people who are rude, smelly,
or seem dangerous. They cite
this as a strong deterrent to
commuting on the MAX.
- Another current deterrent
to using public transportation
is the lack of safe, free/affordable
parking near MAX stations and
other major transit centers
(see above as well).
- Many people also state feeling
unsafe riding busses or MAX
trains late at night and comment
on the gang activity, drug dealing,
fights and other unpleasant
and unsafe behaviors witnessed
on public transit.
| “Monitor
behavior of riders on the
MAX. Drug use [and] obscene
language make for an uncomfortable,
sometimes threatening, ride.” |
| "Do
you know that the Sunset
Transit Center Parking lot
is completely filled by
7:20 am? Do you realize
what a deterrent that is
to use public transportation?” |
| “I
would like to see a more
effective mass transit system.
The train is most often
very crowded in the morning
and evening when people
are going to and coming
from work. If Tri Met wants
more riders, why is it not
possible to provide enough
cars for a comfortable ride?” |
- Monitor and enforce
rules on the MAX more.
- “Eliminate Fareless Square
or put patrols on the MAX trains.”
- “More parking to make it
easier to use Tri-met.”
- Increase safety on the MAX
(especially at night) by making
trains less crowded. This will
increase ridership.
- Create underground parking
lots near MAX stations.
- Improve safety at bus stops.
- Address drug dealing on the
busses, MAX, and at bus stops.
- Educate public transit users
in riding etiquette and safety.
More
affordable public transportation:
- There is overwhelming consensus
that public transportation should
be made more affordable.
- Many people advocate reducing
fares or providing “frequent
user” discounts or annual pass
discounts.
- Other people suggest making
public transit more affordable
by providing tax write-offs
for tri-met passes, rebates
or discounts on other city amenities
for users of public transportation.
- Extend the Fareless
Square East and West.
- Assess a toll on vehicles
that enter downtown to pay for
extended mass transit that is
free for all.
- “We should allow tax deductions
for transportation costs associated
with TriMet, i.e. write off
a yearly TriMet pass on your
Multnomah County tax return.”
- “I also think there should
be incentives for people who
commute using the MAX, Bus,
Carpool, or bike/walk/run. Either
in the form of a city tax break
of a certain percentage, or
coupons that could be used around
the city for museums, theater,
zoo or other tours that people
can use in return for helping
with our traffic problem.”
- “Take away the parking costs
for outside transit centers.
This discourages use of mass
transit into the city because
if people have to pay, then
they will drive and pay to park.”
- Public
transportation investments should
serve the greatest number of
people possible.
- Many people speak of using
public transportation dollars
to fund projects that serve
the majority of commuters as
opposed to small interest groups.
- Examples mention included
covering all bus stops before
creating a new MAX line, or
extending streetcar services
before creating aerial trams.
| “We
spend too much $$$ on trolleys
and light rail, while the
98% of the traveling population
is stuck in traffic.” |
- Public
transportation can and should
be cleaner and “greener.”
- People value public transportation
because it reduces reliance
on cars and contributes to a
cleaner environment.
- People want to see public
transportation running on cleaner
fuel; higher grade diesel, bio-fuel
or electricity.
- People believe that public
transportation in The Pearl
contributes to polluted air
and feel that inner city busses
should be particularly clean
and green.
|
- Is
Portland’s public transportation system
excellent, decent, or in need of major
improvement?
Portlanders disagree over the quality
of the City’s current transportation
system. Many survey respondents cited
public transportation as one of the
things they value most about Portland,
expressing the belief that Portland’s
transit system is one of the best in
the country. These respondents believe
that Portland is on the cutting edge
of urban transit, and congratulate the
City for the system that has already
been created.
Many others, however, feel the system
needs a major overhaul as can be seen
in some of the “main ideas” and strategies
listed above. These respondents make
unfavorable comparisons between Portland’s
system and systems in other cities
(such as Boston or NY) as well as
other countries. Primary system-level
complaints are that Portland’s public
transportation services are poorly
integrated, not sufficiently comprehensive
and too slow.
In between these two groups of people
are respondents who generally appreciate
the current system but want minor
changes and adjustments to be made.
These changes include reducing fares,
covering more bus stops, requiring
busses to run on cleaner fuel, adding
new bus routes and other suggestions
of this nature.
- Should
public transit be expanded?
While most respondents in this section
favor expanding at least some forms
of public transit (e.g. bus, MAX,
streetcar, trolley), a vocal minority
of respondents do not want to see
public transit expanded any further.
These respondents value being able
to travel quickly and easily around
the city in private automobiles and
feel antagonized by what they perceive
as Portland’s “anti-car” attitude.
Specifically, they are frustrated
by worsening road conditions and increased
congestion, which they feel is part
of a conscious City strategy to “push
them out of their cars” by making
driving less attractive.
Many respondents make a point of
mentioning that cars are not going
to become obsolete anytime soon. They
therefore want the City to focus on
maintaining, improving and widening
roads in anticipation of increased
automobile traffic as Portland’s population
grows. They would like to see public
funds spent on projects that facilitate
car travel, noting that less congested
roads will benefit transit riders
as well.
- Should
more MAX lines be created?
Among the majority that wants to
see public transit expanded, many
people specifically ask for additional
MAX lines to be built. Specifically,
a number of respondents suggest new
lines North to Vancouver, South to
Wilsonville or even Salem and into
SE along McLoughlin or other routes.
A number of people also request express
MAX lines connecting the outer East
and West sides of town (bypassing
downtown).
Other respondents, however, do not
want to see any more public money
spent on the MAX. They would prefer
to see public transit dollars go towards
creating a seamless and efficient
bus/streetcar/trolley system that
serves all neighborhoods equally well.
These respondents feel that the MAX
serves a very limited number of commuters,
while the bus system has the potential
to serve the entire city. In the spirit
of wanting public transit dollars
to benefit the many, not the few,
they therefore advocate for halting
MAX expansion.
- Should
Fareless Square be expanded, eliminated
or left as is?
Within this section, a debate emerges
about Fareless Square and whether it
should be expanded, eliminated or maintained
as is. Many respondents highly value
Fareless Square, expressing the belief
that it invigorates downtown and contributes
to a walkable and people-friendly inner
city. There were many calls to “keep
Fareless Square” with others making
suggestions for how Fareless Square
could be expanded (e.g. a bigger section
of downtown, more Eastside neighborhoods).
However, some people want to see
Fareless Square eliminated because
they believe it contributes to creating
an uncomfortable and/or unsafe environment
on the MAX. These people typically
identify themselves as “regular commuters”
who are frustrated by the smelly,
rude, gang-involved, aggressive, etc…
people riding the MAX. The belief
expressed is that these people would
not be on the MAX if they could not
board it free in Fareless Square.
By eliminating Fareless Square, they
hope to create a more pleasant commuting
environment and encourage more cross-town
commuters to use the MAX.
|