Traffic
needs to be dealt with now, before it becomes a major
problem.
Most people who mention traffic believe that it will
become a major problem if proactive steps are not taken
now to develop comprehensive solutions. While a number
of people acknowledge that Portland’s traffic situation
is better than that of other major cities, they worry
that this will soon cease to be the case. Others feel
that traffic has already gotten out of hand, and note
a number of specific “problem areas” that need fixing
in the immediate to near future. Portlanders want to
minimize the amount of time spent in their cars and
imagine a future in which “commuting and traveling in
and out of the city is easy, safe, and uncongested—a
pleasant experience.”
While Portlanders agree that traffic and long commute
times reduce quality of life, there are major disagreements
on how to address the city’s traffic problems. Three
distinct perspectives emerge, each with workable but
conflicting solutions for reducing and/or preventing
traffic. However, despite these disagreements on methods,
respondents concur that congestion must be addressed
soon if the City is to prevent the traffic nightmares
associated with other West coast cities.
- Long
commutes in cars are highly undesirable.
- Traffic
is relatively manageable now, but will be unbearable
in the future if nothing is done.
- Traffic is already a major
problem requiring immediate City attention.
- In Portland, public transportation
and auto traffic are inter-related.
- How can we solve and prevent
traffic problems in Portland?
- Long
commutes in cars are highly undesirable.
- Depending on where people live and work,
some Portlanders feel that commute times are
quite good while others complain of long (45
minute plus) commute times.
- Portlanders agree that commute times should
be kept to a minimum; many mention 20 minutes
or less as the ideal commute time.
| "[In
2030] lots of intelligence and money have
gone into designing and maintaining the
road ways, so a ten minute trip to the
store does not end in road rage and a
commute to work leaves you feeling like
a human being at the end.” |
- Have employers stagger the times
at which people enter and exit work.
- Create more affordable housing so people
can live closer to their places of work.
- “Increase mass transit and buses to suburbs.
More carpooling.”
- Create express bus and MAX lines to reduce
the length of cross-town commutes on public
transportation.
- Many Portlanders agree that “additional
freeway lanes are needed in many areas.”
- Traffic
is relatively manageable now, but will be
unbearable in the future if nothing is done.
- People who move to Portland from other large
cities (LA, D.C., NYC., Seattle, etc..) express
the opinion that traffic is better in Portland
than in these other places.
- Many respondents note that as the city becomes
denser, traffic is sure to increase.
- Respondents believe that traffic will be
a major problem in the future if the City
doesn’t take steps now to plan for it.
| “Sure
we have some traffic… but nothing like
the snarls you see around ‘big cities.’
I don’t want Portland to become the next
Seattle.” |
| “Traffic
will be a huge issue in 20 years and it’s
not too soon to start planning for it!
Look at Seattle and how terrible their
traffic is, and Portland could end up
the same way. Yuck!" |
- Developers should be required to
plan for how new traffic will be handled when
they create new developments.
- “A focus on creating more self-sustaining
neighborhoods. The reason for this is to reduce
the number of people commuting into the city
core for work. Living close to work is the
only way to alleviate this problem.”
- Widen roads and freeways in anticipation
of population growth in coming years.
- Create better incentives for people to switch
from using cars to using public transportation
(many ideas for incentives are mentioned in
Transportation:
Public Transportation).
- “Decrease auto traffic by increasing licensing
fees, fuel tax, [and] parking fees.”
- Traffic
is already a major problem requiring immediate
City attention.
- Many people mention that traffic has been
getting progressively worse in Portland over
the years. Some people feel this is a relatively
recent development (in the past 5 years or
so) while others feel it began ten or even
fifteen years ago.
- A number of respondents feel that traffic
has reached a point where it is unmanageable,
unhealthy and a major stressor in their lives.
- People speak of witnessing acts of road
rage and believe that traffic is making Portlanders
less friendly and more aggressive.
- Many respondents lament having to idle their
cars in bumper-to-bumper rush-hour traffic,
as this creates unnecessary pollution.
- There are certain “chronic areas” that
are consistently jammed up. Frequently mentioned
problem areas included (in no particular order):
downtown, I-5 from N. Lombard through the
Marquam Bridge, Hwy 26 from Beaverton to Portland,
I-84 and the Columbia River Crossing.
| “I
think the city is noticeably more difficult
to navigate in the past four years. I
agree with the city’s efforts to create
a dense core, but more attention to traffic
–cars, bikes, and pedestrians –is needed.” |
| “The
more Portland improves, the more congested
it gets. Waiting in traffic, sometimes
sitting through 3 red lights to get somewhere,
is a major headache.” |
- Improve traffic light synchronization.
Many respondents cite specific intersections
downtown and on the inner Eastside where traffic
lights seem poorly synchronized.
- “Study large cities throughout the world
to find methods of handling traffic ... And
find best practices that could be applicable
in Portland.”
- “More lanes on the major streets (like
Powell, Division, etc.) to handle the traffic
jams.”
- “I hope to see public transportation improved
to alleviate traffic gridlock and pollution.”
- Increase streetcar and bus routes on the
Eastside to link more people and neighborhoods
to MAX lines and express bus routes.
Downtown:
- Make certain parts of downtown
“car-less.”
- Charge a vehicle toll on cars entering certain
parts of downtown similar to that levied in
London.
- Increase the use of public transit downtown
by enlarging the size of Fareless Square.
- Decrease the use of cars downtown by creating
underground parking lots near freeway exits
where commuters can leave their cars and board
public transit downtown.
- Improve the synchronization of traffic lights
throughout downtown, especially during rush
hour.
- “Discourage unnecessary driving by raising
parking costs downtown and in the central
core.”
Interstate 5:
- Create a circular route around Portland
so that North/South traffic on I-5 can bypass
downtown Portland.
- Create an underground “through tunnel” or
“express tunnel” for I-5 commuters who do
not want to exit downtown.
- Add additional lanes to I-5 between North
Lombard street and downtown Portland.
- Create MAX lines that go North to Vancouver
and South to Wilsonville or Salem to ease
traffic on I-5.
- Build a bullet train from Seattle to San
Diego, so West Coast travelers can move quickly
between all the major cities.
Columbia River Crossing:
- Many people suggest building
another bridge between Washington and Oregon
to ease congestion between Vancouver and Portland.
- A number of other respondents advocate for
an express MAX from Vancouver to downtown
with a big park and ride lot in Vancouver.
- In
Portland, public transportation and auto traffic
are interrelated.
- Portlanders understand (and seem frustrated
by the fact that) the busses and the MAX can
only move at the speed of car traffic. They
fear that as long as there is auto congestion,
these forms of mass transit will not be as
fast as they could be, which in turn will
deter riders, creating additional auto congestion.
- Many people believed that eventually public
transit in downtown would have to be moved
either below or above ground to ease congestion
in the inner city.
- People also complained about bus stops that
jut into the roadways and block traffic behind
them. They suggest a separate lane or aisle
that busses can pull into when picking
up passengers.
|
- How
can we solve and prevent traffic problems in Portland?
Portlanders seem to agree that traffic negatively
impacts quality of life, increases stress levels and
unnecessarily pollutes the environment. However, they
disagree on how to address and prevent traffic problems.
Opinions on this issue can be divided into three major
groups, each with a roughly equal number of respondents:
Reduce Auto Use.
Some Portlanders believe that the only way to prevent
future traffic is to deter people from using automobiles.
These respondents favor “traffic calming” measures
that slow or deter cars while facilitating the use
of public transit, walking and cycling (e.g. tolls
for entering downtown, more trollies and streetcars,
bike-only lanes, “car-free” downtown).
Improve Traffic Flow.
An equally large number of people oppose this viewpoint,
believing that the solution is not to force people
out of their cars by allowing congestion to get
worse. These respondents call for widened roads
and freeways, better synchronization of traffic
lights, separate routes for cyclists, and other
measures to improve the flow of automobile traffic.
| "To
continue to ignore the need for streets and street
improvements will lead to bad roads and slow down
the traffic flow with roadblocks when we really
need to smooth the autos out of the living areas
of the inner city- not clog them more.” |
| “Quit
trying to get me on a choo-choo, and get me some
freeway capacity.” |
Pursue Multiple Strategies.
Still others believe that both of the above solutions
must be pursued simultaneously. More people must be
willing to switch to public transportation and road
conditions must be improved to reduce congestion for
cars, as well as busses and MAX which share the same
roads.
| “[In
2030] most people get around by bike and transit
most of the time…When you need to drive, the roads
aren’t clogged.” |
| “[In
2030] traffic flows reasonably well through the
major corridors, and there are more mass transit
options. Subsidies for public transportation make
riding mass transit cheaper than driving, and
thus attractive to commuters who would otherwise
prefer the convenience of their own vehicle.” |
| 
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|