Traffic
needs to be dealt with now, before it
becomes a major problem.
Most people who mention traffic believe
that it will become a major problem if
proactive steps are not taken now to develop
comprehensive solutions. While a number
of people acknowledge that Portland’s
traffic situation is better than that
of other major cities, they worry that
this will soon cease to be the case. Others
feel that traffic has already gotten out
of hand, and note a number of specific
“problem areas” that need fixing in the
immediate to near future. Portlanders
want to minimize the amount of time spent
in their cars and imagine a future in
which “commuting and traveling in and
out of the city is easy, safe, and uncongested—a
pleasant experience.”
While Portlanders agree that traffic
and long commute times reduce quality
of life, there are major disagreements
on how to address the city’s traffic problems.
Three distinct perspectives emerge, each
with workable but conflicting solutions
for reducing and/or preventing traffic.
However, despite these disagreements on
methods, respondents concur that congestion
must be addressed soon if the City is
to prevent the traffic nightmares associated
with other West coast cities.
-
Long commutes in cars are highly undesirable.
-
Traffic is relatively manageable now,
but will be unbearable in the future
if nothing is done.
- Traffic
is already a major problem requiring
immediate City attention.
- In Portland,
public transportation and auto traffic
are inter-related.
- How can
we solve and prevent traffic problems
in Portland?
- Long
commutes in cars are highly
undesirable.
- Depending on where people
live and work, some Portlanders
feel that commute times are
quite good while others complain
of long (45 minute plus) commute
times.
- Portlanders agree that commute
times should be kept to a minimum;
many mention 20 minutes or less
as the ideal commute time.
| "[In
2030] lots of intelligence
and money have gone into
designing and maintaining
the road ways, so a ten
minute trip to the store
does not end in road rage
and a commute to work leaves
you feeling like a human
being at the end.” |
- Have employers stagger
the times at which people enter
and exit work.
- Create more affordable housing
so people can live closer to
their places of work.
- “Increase mass transit and
buses to suburbs. More carpooling.”
- Create express bus and MAX
lines to reduce the length of
cross-town commutes on public
transportation.
- Many Portlanders agree that
“additional freeway lanes are
needed in many areas.”
- Traffic
is relatively manageable now,
but will be unbearable in the
future if nothing is done.
- People who move to Portland
from other large cities (LA,
D.C., NYC., Seattle, etc..)
express the opinion that traffic
is better in Portland than in
these other places.
- Many respondents note that
as the city becomes denser,
traffic is sure to increase.
- Respondents believe that traffic
will be a major problem in the
future if the City doesn’t take
steps now to plan for it.
| “Sure
we have some traffic… but
nothing like the snarls
you see around ‘big cities.’
I don’t want Portland to
become the next Seattle.”
|
| “Traffic
will be a huge issue in
20 years and it’s not too
soon to start planning for
it! Look at Seattle and
how terrible their traffic
is, and Portland could end
up the same way. Yuck!" |
- Developers should
be required to plan for how
new traffic will be handled
when they create new developments.
- “A focus on creating more
self-sustaining neighborhoods.
The reason for this is to reduce
the number of people commuting
into the city core for work.
Living close to work is the
only way to alleviate this problem.”
- Widen roads and freeways in
anticipation of population growth
in coming years.
- Create better incentives for
people to switch from using
cars to using public transportation
(many ideas for incentives are
mentioned in Transportation:
Public Transportation).
- “Decrease auto traffic by
increasing licensing fees, fuel
tax, [and] parking fees.”
- Traffic
is already a major problem requiring
immediate City attention.
- Many people mention that traffic
has been getting progressively
worse in Portland over the years.
Some people feel this is a relatively
recent development (in the past
5 years or so) while others
feel it began ten or even fifteen
years ago.
- A number of respondents feel
that traffic has reached a point
where it is unmanageable, unhealthy
and a major stressor in their
lives.
- People speak of witnessing
acts of road rage and believe
that traffic is making Portlanders
less friendly and more aggressive.
- Many respondents lament having
to idle their cars in bumper-to-bumper
rush-hour traffic, as this creates
unnecessary pollution.
- There are certain “chronic
areas” that are consistently
jammed up. Frequently mentioned
problem areas included (in no
particular order): downtown,
I-5 from N. Lombard through
the Marquam Bridge, Hwy 26 from
Beaverton to Portland, I-84
and the Columbia River Crossing.
| “I
think the city is noticeably
more difficult to navigate
in the past four years.
I agree with the city’s
efforts to create a dense
core, but more attention
to traffic –cars, bikes,
and pedestrians –is needed.” |
| “The
more Portland improves,
the more congested it gets.
Waiting in traffic, sometimes
sitting through 3 red lights
to get somewhere, is a major
headache.” |
- Improve traffic light
synchronization. Many respondents
cite specific intersections
downtown and on the inner Eastside
where traffic lights seem poorly
synchronized.
- “Study large cities throughout
the world to find methods of
handling traffic ... And find
best practices that could be
applicable in Portland.”
- “More lanes on the major
streets (like Powell, Division,
etc.) to handle the traffic
jams.”
- “I hope to see public transportation
improved to alleviate traffic
gridlock and pollution.”
- Increase streetcar and bus
routes on the Eastside to link
more people and neighborhoods
to MAX lines and express bus
routes.
Downtown:
- Make certain parts
of downtown “car-less.”
- Charge a vehicle toll on cars
entering certain parts of downtown
similar to that levied in London.
- Increase the use of public
transit downtown by enlarging
the size of Fareless Square.
- Decrease the use of cars downtown
by creating underground parking
lots near freeway exits where
commuters can leave their cars
and board public transit downtown.
- Improve the synchronization
of traffic lights throughout
downtown, especially during
rush hour.
- “Discourage unnecessary driving
by raising parking costs downtown
and in the central core.”
Interstate 5:
- Create a circular route around
Portland so that North/South
traffic on I-5 can bypass downtown
Portland.
- Create an underground “through
tunnel” or “express tunnel”
for I-5 commuters who do not
want to exit downtown.
- Add additional lanes to I-5
between North Lombard street
and downtown Portland.
- Create MAX lines that go North
to Vancouver and South to Wilsonville
or Salem to ease traffic on
I-5.
- Build a bullet train from
Seattle to San Diego, so West
Coast travelers can move quickly
between all the major cities.
Columbia River Crossing:
- Many people suggest
building another bridge between
Washington and Oregon to ease
congestion between Vancouver
and Portland.
- A number of other respondents
advocate for an express MAX
from Vancouver to downtown with
a big park and ride lot in Vancouver.
- In
Portland, public transportation
and auto traffic are interrelated.
- Portlanders understand (and
seem frustrated by the fact
that) the busses and the MAX
can only move at the speed of
car traffic. They fear that
as long as there is auto congestion,
these forms of mass transit
will not be as fast as they
could be, which in turn will
deter riders, creating additional
auto congestion.
- Many people believed that
eventually public transit in
downtown would have to be moved
either below or above ground
to ease congestion in the inner
city.
- People also complained about
bus stops that jut into the
roadways and block traffic behind
them. They suggest a separate
lane or aisle that busses can
pull into when picking
up passengers.
|
- How
can we solve and prevent traffic problems
in Portland?
Portlanders seem to agree that traffic
negatively impacts quality of life,
increases stress levels and unnecessarily
pollutes the environment. However, they
disagree on how to address and prevent
traffic problems. Opinions on this issue
can be divided into three major groups,
each with a roughly equal number of
respondents:
Reduce Auto Use.
Some Portlanders believe that the
only way to prevent future traffic
is to deter people from using automobiles.
These respondents favor “traffic calming”
measures that slow or deter cars while
facilitating the use of public transit,
walking and cycling (e.g. tolls for
entering downtown, more trollies and
streetcars, bike-only lanes, “car-free”
downtown).
Improve Traffic Flow.
An equally large number of people
oppose this viewpoint, believing that
the solution is not to force people
out of their cars by allowing congestion
to get worse. These respondents call
for widened roads and freeways, better
synchronization of traffic lights,
separate routes for cyclists, and
other measures to improve the flow
of automobile traffic.
| "To
continue to ignore the need for
streets and street improvements
will lead to bad roads and slow
down the traffic flow with roadblocks
when we really need to smooth the
autos out of the living areas of
the inner city- not clog them more.” |
| “Quit
trying to get me on a choo-choo,
and get me some freeway capacity.” |
Pursue Multiple Strategies.
Still others believe that both of the
above solutions must be pursued simultaneously.
More people must be willing to switch
to public transportation and road conditions
must be improved to reduce congestion
for cars, as well as busses and MAX
which share the same roads.
| “[In
2030] most people get around by
bike and transit most of the time…When
you need to drive, the roads aren’t
clogged.” |
| “[In
2030] traffic flows reasonably well
through the major corridors, and
there are more mass transit options.
Subsidies for public transportation
make riding mass transit cheaper
than driving, and thus attractive
to commuters who would otherwise
prefer the convenience of their
own vehicle.” |
|